Washington, DC —
More than environmental stewardship and philanthropy, nearly
one in two Americans believe the most important proof of
corporate social responsibility is treating employees well.
A national opinion survey
commissioned by the National Consumers League and Fleishman-Hillard
International Communications found that American consumers
have their own views on corporate social responsibility that
run counter to established beliefs.
“Our research reflects an
exciting coming-of-age for consumers, as they are more
empowered than ever to assess and react to corporate social
responsibility issues,” said National Consumers League
President Linda Golodner. “Activists and consumer watchdog
groups remain important opinion leaders, but rank-and-file
Americans are becoming more knowledgeable than ever on
socially responsible behavior, and this trend will influence
businesses and increasingly benefit society.”
Americans Define CSR
in Ways Most Relevant to Them
The survey found that 76
percent of American consumers agree that to be socially
responsible, companies should place employee salary and wage
increases above making charitable contributions. Similarly,
the survey found that 76 percent believe that a company’s
treatment of its employees plays a big role in consumer
purchasing decisions.
“What American consumers
are telling us — perhaps influenced by ongoing coverage of
corporate layoffs and employee-benefit reductions — sheds
new light on how we view corporate social responsibility,”
said Fleishman-Hillard Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
John D. Graham. “If companies want to maintain and
strengthen their reputations, it will be essential for them
to invest actively and visibly in their employees. It is
also more important than ever to understand the online
resources that Americans are using to learn about companies
and their track records for corporate social
responsibility.”
Values Matter
Average Americans feel
strong about buying products from or working for a company
whose values are aligned with their own personal values.
Survey respondents say it’s “extremely” or “very” important
to work for (79 percent), buy products and services from (65
percent), and socialize with (72 percent) those who have
similar values and principles.
“The study findings are
especially welcome because they demonstrate that the brand
of CSR that most corporations favor simply isn’t enough to
impress most consumers,” said Mal Warwick, chair of the
Social Venture Network and co-author of Values-Driven
Business: How to Change the World, Make Money, and Have Fun.
“The consumer attitudes reported in this study reflect more
closely an approach to social responsibility called the
‘triple bottom line,’ in which people, planet, and profit
are balanced. Rather than detract from the traditional
bottom line, this approach, requiring policies that actively
favor the key stakeholders in a business — its employees,
its customers, its suppliers, its community, and its
environment, as well as its owners — makes that business
more competitive.”
Corporate America
Receives Low Marks for CSR Performance
While Americans believe
that social responsibility is important, only 21 percent
give U.S. corporations top marks for being socially
responsible. When asked to rate how companies are performing
compared with two to three years ago, only 30 percent
believe that companies are doing a “somewhat better” or “a
lot better” job of being socially responsible.
The Internet Is
Transforming the CSR Landscape
Use of Internet
technology is changing the way people learn about and
determine which companies are socially responsible, the
survey found.
Almost half of the
respondents (47 percent) say they have used the Internet to
learn about the extent to which a company is or is not being
socially responsible. The survey results also demonstrate
that 53 percent of Americans believe that their own online
research is one of the most credible means by which to shape
their opinions on deciding whether U.S. companies are being
socially responsible.
The research indicates
that a new generation of online activists is emerging that
cuts across many socioeconomic groups in the arena of
corporate social responsibility. Going online to learn and
advocate for social issues appears to be increasingly a
mainstream activity of the average American. The survey
found that 58 percent of survey respondents said that
because of the increased availability of online resources
and information, they (or other people like them) are “more
informed” about companies’ records for social responsibility
than they were a few years ago.
The survey also found a
positive relationship between active Internet use and
engagement in social responsibility. About two-fifths of
those using the Internet have sent e-mail to a company about
its products or services (41 percent) or to an elected state
or federal official about an issue (38 percent). Americans
who frequently use online resources were also more aware of
global standards.
"These survey findings
indicate that as the American public continues to refine its
definition of corporate social responsibility and gain
empowerment through online resources in their new role as
activists for social change, companies, academics, and
interest groups must re-evaluate the criteria they have
established in this arena," said Paul Argenti, professor of
Corporate Communication at Dartmouth's Tuck School of
Business. "Corporations must engage in a new level of
dialogue that resonates with stakeholders' personal values.
They also will have to increase transparency and adopt a
more integrated approach to monitoring and influencing the
online communications shaping their reputations."
About the
Survey
In 2005, Fleishman-Hillard
partnered with the National Consumers League (NCL) to
conduct a benchmark survey that would assess consumer
attitudes toward corporate social responsibility as well as
their behaviors regarding CSR. The survey also tracked the
role that media and technology play in informing people
about what companies are doing to be socially responsible.
In the first quarter of 2006, the professional interviewing
service Western Wats conducted a quantitative survey with
800 U.S. adults nationwide through telephone interviews,
averaging 30 minutes in length. The sampling error for the
survey results reported is plus or minus two to four
percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level.